2026-09-15 · 13 min read
Print PDF (firm letterhead)Interim measures are a speed tool — they can freeze accounts, property or corporate actions. For capital, they are either shield or strike depending on who moves first and how well the motion is grounded.
The court assesses connection to the subject matter, risk of frustrating enforcement and proportionality. Blanket requests without proof of risk fail.
If measures are granted against your company, the task is structured response: replacement security, appeal, evidence of excess, negotiations under counsel control.
Beneficiaries should know the asset and corporate map in advance — measures hit where there is liquidity and control.
Typical errors: late application; excessive scope; no provision for counterparty loss; ignoring foreign accounts without a separate strategy.
After obtaining an order, rapid presentation to bailiffs or the registry matters — delay lets the opponent complete the very act the measure was meant to prevent.
Related reading
- Pre-action procedure in Russian arbitration
The claim letter as a capital tool: deadlines, evidence, mistakes and scenarios for business owners.
- Debt recovery through court: limitation and evidence
Litigation recovery for capital owners: limitation periods, evidence, security and enforcement without illusions of a fast win.
- Director subsidiary liability: when the risk is real
When subsidiary liability stops being theoretical — scenarios for owners, directors and family capital.
- Legal concierge: what the firm mandate includes
How standing support at The Kremlin House of Justice differs from mass retainers — voice intake, mandate boundaries, no public tariff page.
